Skip to content
Disclosure Archives
All themes
Research theme

Epistemology & method

How UAP research should be done. Assessment matrices, field-study methodology, scientific-practice standards, ufology's terminological hygiene, and the question of how much time disclosure has.

7 papers · sorted newest first

  1. Gress

    Philosophy-of-science treatment of the field's own terminology. Argues that the slippage between 'UFO', 'UAP', and 'NHI' obscures otherwise tractable claims.

  2. Szydagis

    Models the policy-and-public-trust window remaining before a hypothetical 'catastrophic' (i.e., unstructured) disclosure event. Pure thought experiment, peer-reviewed.

  3. Ailleris

    Methodological survey of instrumented UAP fieldwork from Hessdalen onward. Identifies the recurring failure modes and what a modern field campaign would have to do differently.

  4. Ammon

    Argues that UAP research needs an explicit, codified standard of good scientific practice — analogous to the codes governing biomedical or forensics research.

  5. Cifone

    Editorial framing Limina's UAP issue. A useful map of the field's open problems, contested claims, and the criteria the journal applies to submissions.

  6. Teodorani

    Teodorani's methodological argument that UAP observation should be assimilated to astronomical practice — calibrated instruments, archival comparison, replication.

  7. Murphy

    Citational-analysis follow-up to Wendt & Duvall's 'Sovereignty and the UFO'. Maps how international-relations theory has actually used (and avoided using) the UFO question.

Other themes