Skip to content
Disclosure Archives
All themes
Research theme

Physics & flight dynamics

What the observed kinematics, accelerations, and electromagnetic effects of UAP would have to mean if the reports are taken at face value — and what physical constraints the data already imposes.

12 papers · sorted newest first

  1. Knuth et al.

    Comprehensive review in a top aerospace journal positioning UAP/UASP as a legitimate research domain — sensor data, observed dynamics, and open questions.

  2. Platzer

    Companion review piece in PAS surveying the state of the UAP record from an aerospace-sciences perspective: what's signal, what's noise, what's left to do.

  3. Lomas et al.

    Proposes a formal matrix for scoring UAP evidence quality across observational, instrumental, and corroboration axes. Companion to the case-analysis literature.

  4. Powell et al.

    Statistical synthesis of physical attributes — shape, size, kinematic profile, EM effects, presence of sound — across the 1947–2016 reporting window.

  5. Loeb

    Derives a lower bound on UAP mass density from observed kinematics — a method for ruling out atmospheric/optical artefacts using basic physics.

  6. Burstein et al.

    Aviation-safety review of UAP-associated incidents from the FAA NMACs and pilot reporting record. Frames UAP as an air-safety dataset, not only a curiosity.

  7. Powell et al.

    SCU white paper preceding the AIAA version. Same dataset, more methodological detail on case selection and coding.

  8. Loeb & Kirkpatrick

    Jointly authored by Galileo Project founder Avi Loeb and then-AARO director Sean Kirkpatrick. Lays out the physical envelope inside which UAP behaviour can lie before requiring new physics.

  9. Oliver

    Examines reported absence of typical aerodynamic interactions (wake turbulence, sonic effects) in UAP observations and what they would imply if real.

  10. Expedition to W-72

    AIAA Aviation 2023 · 2023

    Platte

    Mission report from a UAP field-instrumentation expedition to military Warning Area W-72, including platform configuration and data take.

  11. Loeb

    Applies physical-limit analysis to the Ukrainian Main Astronomical Observatory's reported UAP observations. Tests what they could and could not have been.

  12. Knuth et al.

    Quantitative estimation of accelerations, velocities, and propulsion power implied by selected UAP case kinematics. The early peer-reviewed treatment.

Other themes